Skip to main content

How to review a report

Use the request approval workflow to have reports and letters peer-reviewed before sending to clients or providers. Covers reviewer selection, feedback, and collaboration.

Updated over 2 weeks ago

How to review a report

Tacklit's report and letter builder includes a built-in approval workflow that allows you to have your work reviewed by a colleague before it's sent to a client or external provider. This is particularly valuable in clinical settings where peer review improves quality and ensures accuracy.

How the approval process works

Requesting a review

  1. Complete your report or letter — write the content in the report builder, filling in all relevant sections

  2. Click Request Approval — this initiates the review workflow

  3. Select your reviewer — choose a colleague from your practice who should review the document. This could be a senior clinician, supervisor, or any team member with the appropriate permissions

  4. Submit for review — the reviewer receives a notification that a report is waiting for their feedback

Reviewing and providing feedback

When you're selected as a reviewer:

  1. Open the report — access the report from your notifications or the client's profile

  2. Review the content — read through the report sections and assess the content

  3. Add comments and feedback — leave comments on specific sections of the report. You can highlight areas that need changes, suggest edits, or confirm sections are ready

  4. Approve or request changes — either approve the report for sending, or send it back to the author with your feedback

Collaborating on revisions

The approval workflow supports back-and-forth collaboration. The original author can review feedback, make updates, and resubmit for approval. Both parties can add comments and track changes throughout the process until the report meets the required standard.

When to use the approval workflow

  • Clinical reports — ensure diagnostic summaries, treatment plans, or discharge reports are reviewed before going to referrers or GPs

  • Letters to providers — have a colleague check referral letters or correspondence before sending

  • Supervised practitioners — registrars or provisionally registered practitioners can route reports through their supervisor for sign-off

  • Multi-disciplinary teams — get input from team members across disciplines before finalising a shared care report

Tip: The approval workflow creates a record of who reviewed the report and when, which is valuable for clinical governance and audit purposes.

Did this answer your question?